Photobucket
A Message Board, Guestbook, or Poll hosted for your website.
Register Login Calendar New Posts Chat
 
Return to Website > Forums > The Cutting Edge > researcxh confrims assocaition wbweteen Breast cnacer and menigioma
 
Username:  
Password:  
 
   
 


Thread Tools Search This Thread 
Reply
 
Author Comment
 
mrsb
queen
Registered: 05/03/08
Posts: 82

    08/26/09 at 01:33 PM
  Reply with quote#1

Hi everyone I was diagnosed with a meningioma(brain tumor) last year at year 5
1/2. This article was recently posted on Meningioma Mommas forum showing an association  between meningioma and breast cancer. Thought you might be interested.
 from the upcoming Sept. 2009 issue of Neurosurgery.

http://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fu ... in.16.aspx

Shelagh
nosurrender
Avatar / Picture

Benevolent Dictator
Registered: 09/07/07
Posts: 5,019

    08/26/09 at 08:44 PM
  Reply with quote#2

Shelagh the link doesn't work... do you have another? This is VERY interesting!

__________________


WE WILL PREVAIL





mrsb
queen
Registered: 05/03/08
Posts: 82

    08/27/09 at 06:07 AM
  Reply with quote#3

The Association of Breast Cancer and Meningioma in Men and Women

Rao, Ganesh M.D.; Giordano, Sharon H. M.D., M.P.H.; Liu, Jun M.S.; McCutcheon, Ian E. M.D.

Free Access
Continued Medical Education
Article Outline

Author Information

Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Rao) (McCutcheon)

Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Giordano)

Department of Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Liu)

Reprint requests: Ganesh Rao, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 442, Houston, TX 77030. Email: grao@mdanderson.org

FIGURE. EXAMS AVAILA...
Image Tools

Received, November 15, 2008.

Accepted, April 13, 2009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An association between breast cancer and intracranial meningioma has been described in women. We sought to determine whether this connection exists in men as well, hypothesizing that causes unrelated to sex may be responsible.

Cited Here...: We queried state cancer registries that recorded data on breast cancer and meningioma. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology codes for breast cancer and meningioma were used. The incidence rate of the second primary tumor was compared between identified meningioma and breast cancer cohorts and the general population for each sex.

Cited Here...: Five state registries collected data on men and women from 1995 to 2003. The incidence of meningioma was 2.6 and 0.96 (cases per 100 000) for women and men, respectively, during this period. The incidence of breast cancer was 61 and 0.69 (cases per 100 000) for women and men, respectively, during this period. One man and 439 women were diagnosed with both diseases. The standardized incidence ratio was used to determine the magnitude of association between breast cancer and meningioma. During the study period, the standardized incidence ratio indicated a stronger than expected association between breast cancer and meningioma in women, regardless of which disease was diagnosed first. In every year except one, the standardized incidence ratio indicated no association between breast cancer and meningioma in men, regardless of which disease was diagnosed first.

Cited Here...: Our results support a strong association between meningioma and breast cancer in women. Conversely, we were unable to show as strong an association in men. This suggests that the connection between these diseases may be dependent on sex.

ABBREVIATIONS: CI, confidence interval; ICD-O, International Classification of Diseases for Oncology; SIR, standardized incidence ratio

An association between meningioma and breast cancer has been reported in the medical literature in small series or case reports (2,9,13,14,16,21,22,24,27,28,39,41,44,46,48,51,52,5 5,60,63-66,70,76). Larger series have calculated the relative risk for a woman to develop an intracranial meningioma while carrying a diagnosis of breast cancer (or vice versa) to be between 1.5 and 2.0 (1,3,36,60). Other studies have reported lesser degrees of risk (25,38). The most commonly proposed explanation for this association involves the hormonal receptors present in both tumors, particularly meningiomas (5-8,10,11,15,17-19,29,31,34,37,42,47,49,50,56,67-69,72). Indeed, variation in the levels of sex hormones in women has been reported to influence growth of meningioma (4,35,40,45,58). Although the risk of breast cancer is many times higher for women than for men, the risk of meningioma is also higher for women than men by at least 2-fold (23,54). Whether androgen or estrogen receptor activity is responsible for the sex association is unclear, with some investigators showing a similar expression profile for these receptors in meningioma tissue taken from both men and women (43).

Male breast cancer is very rare, with an incidence of approximately 1 case per 100 000 in the United States (33). The additional risk for developing a meningioma is unknown, owing to the relative rarity of both diseases in men. A lack of association between these diseases in men would indicate a sex-specific phenomenon (possibly related to hormonal levels, rather than hormone receptor expression). Conversely, an increased risk of having both diseases in men would suggest that factors unrelated to sex drive this association. Pooling data from individual state cancer registries, we determined the incidence of breast cancer and meningioma separately in men and in women and also identified patients diagnosed with both diseases for comparison. Here, we show that the association of breast cancer and meningioma in men is essentially nonexistent, but the association of these diseases in women is indeed quite strong.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This population-based study received approval from the Institutional Review Board at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The state cancer registries of Arizona, Colorado, Massachusetts, New York, and Texas were queried to identify patients with diagnoses of breast cancer and meningioma. These 5 cancer registries were used because they recorded disease-specific International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) histology codes for breast cancer and meningioma in both male and female patients (30). These registries were also able to provide numbers of patients per year diagnosed with both diseases. Furthermore, these registries maintained these data for the same time period (1995-2004) of at least 10 years. All registries used are full and sustaining members of the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. These cancer registries obtain information primarily from hospital reporting, pathology reports, and death certificates, and they adhere to strict standardized criteria for cancer registration (available at http://www.naaccr.org). In general, these registries assign unique patient identifier numbers to keep track of registered patients, thus enabling them to identify patients who are diagnosed with each cancer type.

For meningioma, ICD-O codes 0, 1, and 3 were used; these codes correspond to benign, atypical, and malignant meningiomas, respectively. For breast cancer, ICD-O codes 2 and 3, which correspond to in situ and malignant cancers, respectively, were used. The population of each state for each year studied was obtained from the United States Census Bureau and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Only adult populations (18 years of age or older) of each state were used. Patient data was de-identified by the cancer registry. Information on age and race was not available from all registries. In the interest of patient confidentiality (given the relative rarity of having both diagnoses), the specific dates of each diagnosis were unavailable; however, the year each diagnosis was made was available.

The incidence rate of the second tumor (either breast cancer or meningioma) was compared between identified meningioma and breast cancer cohorts and the general population. The incidence rates were calculated with the assumption that the population at risk was followed for 1 year. On the basis of the independent incidence rates of each cancer, an expected incidence rate of each tumor on an annual basis was calculated. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was used to determine the magnitude of the association between breast cancer and meningioma. The SIR was defined as follows: SIR = D/E, where D is the observed number of events in the cohort, and E is the expected number of events in the cohort (12,61). The exact 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated with assumption of a Poisson distribution for the data (61,62). The statistical analysis was performed using S-Plus 7.1 software.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Data on patients with breast cancer and meningioma were available from the 5 cancer registries for a common 9-year epoch from 1995 through 2003. During this period, a total of 6527 meningiomas and 153 599 breast cancers were diagnosed in women (Table 1). During this same period, a total of 2327 meningiomas and 1668 breast cancers were diagnosed in men (Table 2). The mean incidences (cases per 100 000) of meningioma and breast cancer in women during the study period were 2.6 and 61, respectively. The mean incidences of meningioma and breast cancer in men during the study period were 0.96 and 0.69, respectively.


Table 1
Image Tools

Table 2
Image Tools

During the study period, 219 of the 6103 women already diagnosed with meningioma (3.6%) were diagnosed with breast cancer. The mean number of breast cancer cases diagnosed per year in women who already had a diagnosis of meningioma was 24, and the median was 28. The number of women with meningioma expected to develop breast cancer (on an annual basis) during the study period ranged from 0.22 to 0.64, and the cumulative number of expected cases was 3.74 (Table 3). For the 9-year period, the SIR of patients diagnosed with breast cancer in a woman already harboring a meningioma was 58 (95% CI, 51-67). The mean number of breast cancer cases diagnosed per year in women with meningioma was 36, and the median was 37. During this same time period, 320 of the 153 276 women already diagnosed with breast cancer (0.2%) were diagnosed with meningioma (Table 4). The expected number of women developing meningioma who already had a diagnosis of breast cancer (on an annual basis) during the study period ranged from 0.23 to 0.66, and the cumulative expected number of cases was 4. For the 9-year period, the SIR of developing meningioma in a woman already diagnosed with breast cancer was 80 (95% CI, 72-89).


Table 3
Image Tools

Table 4
Image Tools

During the study period, 1 of the 2327 men diagnosed with meningioma (0.04%) was diagnosed with breast cancer. The mean number of breast cancer cases diagnosed per year in men during this period was 0.1, and the median was 0. During the study period, the SIR for developing a subsequent breast cancer when already diagnosed with meningioma was 0 for all years except one (1999), in which the 1 case was identified. In this year, the SIR was 443 (95% CI, 12-2785). The expected number of breast cancer cases in men already diagnosed with meningioma was low, ranging from 0.001 to 0.003, with a cumulative expected number of cases over the 9 years of 0.02 (Table 5). During this same period, 0 cases of meningioma were diagnosed in the 1667 men who were already diagnosed with breast cancer. The expected number of meningioma cases developing in male breast cancer patients ranged from 0.001 to 0.003, and the cumulative expected number of cases during the 9-year period was 0.02. The SIR for developing meningioma in men with an existing diagnosis of breast cancer was 0 for all years (Table 6).


Table 5
Image Tools

Table 6
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

The association between breast cancer and meningioma has been described in women, but there has been some debate regarding the strength of this link. We queried 5 state cancer registries to identify patients (male and female) diagnosed with meningioma, breast cancer, or both diseases. Here, we show that women with one disease are at increased risk of being diagnosed with the other, when comparing the number of expected cases with observed cases. However, this risk does not appear to exist in men. These results suggest that the association between meningioma and breast cancer is a sex-specific phenomenon.

Our results indicate that the link between meningioma and breast cancer in women is stronger than previously reported. The cumulative observed rate of breast cancer in patients already diagnosed with meningioma was 80 times the expected rate. Similarly, the cumulative observed rate of meningioma in patients already diagnosed with breast cancer was 58 times the expected rate. However, the link is not apparent in men with either disease. We were able to identify only 1 case of a man who developed breast cancer after being diagnosed with meningioma. No cases of meningioma were identified in men previously diagnosed with breast cancer.

This study draws upon a population of over 25 000 000 patients per year for each sex. This is the largest population evaluated to determine the increased risk of developing meningioma in patients diagnosed with breast cancer and vice versa. Despite the large population studied, there are limitations to this analysis, and certain assumptions were made. For example, for each year, it was assumed that the population of each state remained stable. This assumption may be less appropriate for Western states, such as Arizona and Colorado, which are known to have higher migration rates. Although each state registry provided de-identified information on patients, including specific dates of diagnosis of each disease, it is unknown whether or not these patients may have lived previously or subsequently in a different state.

Breast cancer rates vary significantly between age groups and racial groups in the United States. The highest rates are seen in Caucasians, and the lowest rates are seen in Native Americans. Racial differences were not taken into consideration, nor were age ranges, in our study. The incidence of breast cancer increases with age, with incidences ranging from 1.4 cases per 100 000 in women of ages 20 to 24 years to 499 cases per 100 000 in women aged 75 to 79 years. Indeed, our overall breast cancer incidence of approximately 61 cases per 100 000 is somewhat lower than the typically reported rates of breast cancer, which range from 120 to 140 cases per 100 000 (57).

Meningioma is considered a benign brain tumor and has, until recently, not been consistently recorded in either national or state cancer registries. As a consequence, we were limited to the 5 state cancer registries we used in the study because they maintained records of meningioma cases for several years. Although the 5 states combined have a sizable population (approximately 25 million per sex per year of the study), they represent only approximately one-sixth of the total population of the United States. Regional cancer rates may be higher or lower, and thus the generalizability of our results to the total population of the United States may be limited.

Many patients harbor incidental meningiomas that are asymptomatic and may be followed rather than removed (53). This may underestimate the true incidence of meningioma in this study, given that imaging of the brain may not be performed in patients with breast cancer unless they are experiencing neurological symptoms. Additionally, if a patient with either disease is diagnosed and followed solely on an outpatient basis, then the patient may not be captured by a cancer registry (a conceivable scenario in a patient with a small, incidentally found meningioma). Conversely, the increased vigilance in patients diagnosed with breast cancer may have resulted in an increase in the diagnosis of incidental meningiomas, thus artificially elevating the association of these diseases. The reported incidence of meningioma in men and women in the general population is estimated at 3.2 and 7.2, respectively (20). Although the incidences we identified in our study for meningioma were lower, we used data from 5 states, whereas the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States uses data from 19 states. Finally, although we were able to identify which disease was diagnosed first (solely as a function of when the disease was reported to the cancer registry), we do not know which disease actually occurred first in these patients. For example, it is possible that a patient may have been harboring an intracranial meningioma for some time before a breast cancer diagnosis. Although we report an increased risk in women of being diagnosed with one disease when already diagnosed with another, a temporal association of these tumors, and any suggestion of one tumor influencing the initiation and development of the other, is dubious at best. Thus, we do not claim an increased risk of developing one tumor as a consequence of the other, only that an association of these diagnoses exists in women and not in men.

The results of our study lend support to the posture of remaining vigilant for intracranial lesions in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Although no such recommendation has been levied by national cancer agencies, an increased index of suspicion regarding an intracranial lesion may be warranted in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Although our results suggest an increased risk of breast cancer in patients diagnosed with meningioma and vice versa, it may be difficult to justify increased screening for breast cancer (beyond what is already recommended for women in the United States) for women diagnosed with meningioma. Any increased screening recommendation would likely come as a consequence of validating these findings in a prospectively followed cohort of patients.

A definite limitation to the study is the relative rarity of breast cancer in men, and this may be attributable to a low index of suspicion for the disease (71). The incidence of breast cancer in men in our study was less than 1 in 100 000. This low incidence may have profound influences on statistical analysis. Thus, we interpreted the 1 case of concomitant breast cancer and meningioma in the male population as lower than the expected number of cases during the 9-year time period. However, it is possible that even with a cumulative study period of 9 years, and an expected incidence of 0.02 cases during this time, the time frame used was not sufficient to adequately document the true incidence of the association. Indeed, the 1 case of breast cancer occurring after meningioma in the male population (in 1999) has a SIR of 443, demonstrating that very small numbers are sufficient to affect the results and subsequent conclusions of this study. Conversely, there were 0 cases of meningioma being diagnosed after breast cancer in men.

The etiology of the apparent sex-specific phenomenon of this association is unclear. Although hormone receptors have been implicated in the development and progression of both tumor types, it is difficult to know for certain what is behind the association of these tumor types in women. Meningiomas have long been known to harbor both progesterone and estrogen receptors (7,19,50). Progesterone receptors are more prevalent and more biologically active, however, and are increased in recurrent tumors, suggesting that they play a role in proliferation (59). Estrogen receptors do not appear to play a significant role, as evidence of their presence in meningiomas is much weaker (5,10,37,50). In their study of progesterone and estrogen receptor expression in meningiomas obtained from men and women, Korhonen et al. (43) found an equal rate of expression of these receptors in tumors obtained from both sexes. They concluded that the higher incidence of meningioma in women could not be explained by differences in receptor expression.

Similarly, breast cancers harbor estrogen and progesterone hormone receptors, but the expression rate is somewhat variable, with the rates of expression commensurate with increases in patient age (33). Male breast cancer has some similarities to female breast cancer, including histological subtypes (although lobular cancers are less common in men), but estrogen and progesterone receptors are expressed at a significantly higher rate, and Her2-neu is expressed at a lower rate (26,32,33,73-75). Increased hormone receptors present in male breast cancers seem to belie the lack of association with meningioma seen in women; thus, despite our results supporting a significantly higher association of meningioma and breast cancer in women, it is difficult to attribute this relationship definitively to hormonal receptor differences between the sexes. Still, hormonal differences may be responsible, since women have a much higher lifetime exposure to estrogen and progesterone than do men. Thus, despite similarities in receptor expression, hormone exposure may be the definitive difference and may explain the apparent sex-related phenomenon.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

This population study indicates that the association between breast cancer and meningioma is very strong in women. However, the same association was not observed in men. This difference suggests that the association of these diseases is peculiar to women. This phenomenon may be a consequence of the higher cumulative exposure to hormones experienced by women throughout their lifetimes.

Back to Top | Article Outline
nosurrender
Avatar / Picture

Benevolent Dictator
Registered: 09/07/07
Posts: 5,019

    08/27/09 at 07:59 PM
  Reply with quote#4

This is amazing. Shelagh, how was yours treated? How did you know you had it, what were your symptoms? I think it would be important for me to put the symptoms up someplace so women will know what to look for.
Thank you SO MUCH for this!


__________________


WE WILL PREVAIL





mrsb
queen
Registered: 05/03/08
Posts: 82

    08/28/09 at 02:09 PM
  Reply with quote#5

Hi Gina I was diagnosed last summer by ct scan(in the middle of my daughters wedding in fact). I had no symptoms that i had complained of, not even a headache My super smart Family Dr who manages somehow to stay on top of my complicated medical problems felt that as I had reached my  5 year post BC that she should check me out. at that time i was wanting to stay on Femara. Here we are returned to our family drs care  withing a few years of diagnosis unless we are actively being treated... Femara etc doesn't count I guess...So off I trotted for my ct scan not expecting any  thing when i found myself off the table and told to report to family Dr immediately .I had a 4.0cm mass(this was not the news to receive when you have a houseful of wedding guests and a wedding in 3 days. 2 days later i was in to see the neurosurgeon, MRi and with a surgery date exactly one week from the original ct scan.My NS thought the tumor had been there 10  yearsor so. I had a successful surgery ..no other treatment  needed and just go for yearly MRI and visits with the NS.Because of the location (vision centre  i did experience some pheripheral vision issues but these have resolved.So I guess  I was a
l ucky lady.
Calico
Avatar / Picture

lifetime member
Registered: 03/16/08
Posts: 1,091

    08/28/09 at 05:21 PM
  Reply with quote#6

Lucky lady indeed.....glad to hear a good outcome story!!!


__________________
~ There are lies, damned lies and statistics ~
kareylou
Bag of Chips
Registered: 02/26/08
Posts: 19

    10/23/09 at 05:30 PM
  Reply with quote#7

There may also be a genetic component (speculating here), because I am 5yrs out from BC and my sister was just diagnosed with a meningioma. She had neurological symptoms (headache, loss of motor control on one side) and eventually saw a neurosurgeon. The consensus is to watch-and-wait, with a repeat scan in six months to see if it is growing.
I am a little troubled that with symptoms, they are still waiting, while you got yours out before you had symptoms. I fear hers may be in a spot that is trickier for surgical removal.
So glad to hear you got such good treatment and are doing well. What unfortunate timing to find it during your daughter's wedding! I hope you managed to enjoy yourself anyway, and hope you are enjoying your good health.
mrsb
queen
Registered: 05/03/08
Posts: 82

    11/04/09 at 03:35 PM
  Reply with quote#8

I think a lot of m are likely found on autopsy.Yes i was very lucky .might i suggest meningioma mommas as a good site for your sister.Much like this Forum they are a knowledge caring bunch of ladies. I can't imagine being on wait and watch but there are lots of ladies on mm that are.
 January is a big moth for me all my bc checks and now the annual MRI for the head.So far I am NED on both counts but will breathe easier after January.I think having BC  first gave me an unusual take on the M it was a gift compared to what i had first thought was mets..I have been very fortunate .
Previous Thread | Next Thread
Reply

  Bookmarks  
Digg DiggFacebook FacebookStumbleUpon StumbleUponGoogle GoogleTwitter Twitter
del.icio.us del.icio.usWindows Live Favorites Windows Live Favoritesreddit reddit

DonateNow